Original Article
 
Comparision of mesiodistal and bucco-lingual dimensions of permanent teeth in North-Indians and North-East Indians: Racial dimorphism as an identification parameter
Harjeet Kaur Sekhon1, Priyanka Sharma2, Jyoti Sharma2, Harmanpreet Singh3, Simranjit Singh4, 5
1MDS, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, D.J. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
2MDS, Ex-Post Graduate, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, D.J. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
3MDS, Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, D.J. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
4Ex-Graduate, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Sri Ganganagar, India
5Certified Dentist, National Dental Examination Boards of Canada

Article ID: 100031D01HS2018
doi: 10.5348/100031D01HS2018OA

Corresponding Author:
Harjeet Kaur Sekhon,
G-166A, Gali No.1,
Jail Road, Hari Nagar,
New Delhi - 110058, India

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar articles in PubMed] [Similar articles in Google Scholar]



How to cite this article
Sekhon HK, Sharma P, Sharma J, Singh H, Singh S. Comparision of mesiodistal and bucco-lingual dimensions of permanent teeth in North-Indians and North-East Indians: Racial dimorphism as an identification parameter. Edorium J Dent 2018;5:100031D01HS2018.


ABSTRACT

Aims: Racial dimorphism refers to those differences in size, stature and appearance between two races among females and males which can be utilized to aid in identification based on dental records. Racial determination forms one of the important aspects of forensic odontology. The study evaluated the permanent teeth to assess and compare the mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of permanent teeth in the North Indian and North-East Indian populations.

Methods: The study sample comprised of 100 subjects (50 males and 50 females). One group comprised individuals from North India, whereas, second group included individuals with ethnic origin in North-East India. Using the digital calliper, the mesiodistal and buccolingual diameters of each permanent tooth were determined. Measurements were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Using statistical program SPSS 19.0 for Windows descriptive statistics were calculated for each group independently, means were compared by sex of the mesiodistal and bucolingual dimensions of the pieces analyzed so intragrupal (Group of north Indian individuals and groups of northeast Indian individuals),significance in the mean differences were analyzed by unpaired t test for independent samples with p <0.01 and p <0.05.

Results: Most of the permanent teeth examined had larger dimensions both mesiodistally and buccolingually in North-East Indians with the exception of maxillary central incisor, maxillary first premolar and maxillary second molar. In general, the group of North-East Indians showed higher racial dimorphism compared to the North Indian group.

Conclusion: The study showed that there is a strong race-specific behavior in dimorphic dimensions of the teeth in both the populations.

Keywords: North East Indians, North Indians, permanent teeth, Racial dimorphism


INTRODUCTION

Racial gender determination using dental features involves either the estimation of dimensions of teeth in both the genders or comparision of occurrence of various non-metric dental traits like deflecting wrinkle of the mandibular first molars, Carabelli’s trait of maxillary molars, distal accessory ridge of the maxillary and mandibular canines or shovelling of the maxillary central incisors [1]. This is based on the fact that, the tooth dimensions are not the same in males and females , although they have similar tooth morphology as the tooth size is determined by different factors that include environmental, genetic, cultural and racial variations [2].

Racial dimorphism refers to those differences in size, stature and appearance between two races among females and males that can be applied to dental identification. Racial determination forms one of the important aspects of forensic odontology [3].

Teeth are the mineralized tissues that are characterized by structures of extra-ordinary resistance to putrefaction and the effect of external agents (physical, trauma, heat, chemical or biological) that cause the destruction of soft parts of body structure. They are useful for odontological, forensic and genetic studies in living and dead populations, which also include evaluation of tooth dimensions for age estimation and gender determination [3], [4], [5]. Teeth being the central component of the masticatory apparatus of the skull are good source of material for civil and medicolegal identification [6]. The variety of teeth, number and morphology in each individual, is a fact, which increases its importance as an identifying element as well as an excellent material for various investigations [3].

The existence of dimorphism in permanent teeth is a well-known phenomenon. This behaviour morphologically determined that the shape and dimensions of tooth are fairly stable [2]. The magnitude and pattern of sexual dimorphism in the size of permanent teeth also differ from one population to another [3]. The size of teeth not only varies between sexes,races and populations, so does between generations. Ebeling et al. suggest that there is an upward trend in the mesiodistal size of the teeth. Even increase in size occurs between successive generations, in both the mesiodistal and in the vestibulolingual diameter [7].

A study conducted in southern Chinese population on mesiodistal dimension of primary as well as the permanent dentition reported sexual dimorphism that ranged from 0.06% - 1.97% and 0.36% - 5.27% in deciduous and the permanent dentition respectively [8].

Within this context, the aim of the present study was to assess and compare the mesiodistal (M-D) and buccolingual (B-L) dimensions of permanent teeth in the North Indian and North-East Indian populations.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample comprised of 100 study models prepared from students (50 males and 50 females) selected from D.J. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar belonging to two ethnic groups. One group comprised individuals from North India. The second group included individuals with ethnic origin in North-East India having distinct phenotypic characteristics such as high and shallow orbits with their upper and lower edges horizontal, high cheek bones, prominent chin, medial side corner of the eye having a crease (Mongoloid fold) and wide, straight and slightly shallow forehead. All the selected cases had complete set of fully erupted teeth without any history or clinical evidence of crown restoration, orthodontic treatment,no spacing or diastema, no crowding and without any trauma. The mean age of samples was 20-25 years.

After obtaining informed consent from each subject and approval from the institutional ethical committee, impressions were made with alginate and dental cast models were made in dental plaster. The models were numbered according to each group and gender of the individual.

The mesiodistal and buccolingual diameters of each permanent tooth were determined., using the digital vernier calliper accurate to 0.01 mm (Mitutoyo Digital Caliper). If it was difficult to place the vernier calliper, manual divider was used with fine tips to measure the mentioned dimensions. The measurements excluded the third molars, supernumerary teeth and various dental anomalies. All the measurements were done by a single examiner to eliminate interobserver error. Each reading was taken three times and the average of three values was obtained to minimize the intraobserver error. The data collected were subjected to statistical analysis. The SPSS software package version 19 was used for statistical analysis. The mean, range and standard deviation were calculated for the size of the tooth by using the unpaired t-test (Figure 1).


RESULTS

Most of the teeth examined had larger size in men in both groups. Most of the permanent teeth examined had larger dimensions both mesiodistally and buccolingually in North-East Indians with the exception of maxillary central incisor, maxillary first premolar and maxillary second molar.

A breakdown of the average size of the mesiodistal and bucolinguals diameters of all analyzed pieces of North Indians and North East Indians groups in Table 1,2,3,4.The probable values of mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions for North Indian and North-East Indian males and females is discussed in Table 5,6.


DISCUSSION

The presence of sexual dimorphism in the sizes of permanent and temporary teeth is a fact well documented in humans and primates. The tooth index has been used as an inexpensive and simple to use tool for gender identification such as mandibular canine-index [9], [10], [11], [12], but there are very few studies conducted to support the evidence of racial dimorphism.

Specific populations have variations in their odontometric features which requires to be considered.The dental measurements can be a reliable tool to identify such variations [13].

Doris et al., has reported that early dentition, particularly in young age is less affected by regressive alterations as attrition and erosion. As a consequence, the mesiodistal dimension of teeth would be less affected [14]. Henceforth, 20-25 years’ age group was selected.

According to Garn et al., teeth have behaved in many ways through the course of evolution [15]. In this study, univariate analysis of M-D dimensions and B-L dimensions of male dentition were greater than those of females which is in accordance with previous studies. Richardson et al., found that teeth of males tend to be larger than those of females for each type of tooth in both the arches [16].

Most studies indicate that the mandibular canine is the tooth that presents the greatest dimorphism, followed by first and second maxillary molars [11]. Another study had found significant difference mainly in buccolingual diameters, but they included all dental groups, the largest difference was found in teeth 44 and 47 (FDI)[12].

Another study has reported a strong population specific behavior in dimorphic dimensions of the teeth [2]. In this study, the mesiodistal and the buccolingual dimensions in North-Indians were less as compared to the North-Eastern Indians. Maxillary central incisor and maxillary first premolar in case of males and maxillary second molar in females were not reliable for determining the dimorphism in tooth size according to the present study.

A study conducted by AsteteJofré et al., [3] among the Spanish and Chilean individuals had found a greater dimorphism in teeth in Spanish individuals, both in mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions.

These results are consistent with another study done in Chilean population [3].

Narang RS et al., in his study conducted in North Indian population has reported that mesiodistal dimensions in first molars and mandibular canine can help in sex determination [17] .

In a study conducted in Udaipur population, buccolingual dimensions were found to be effective tool for gender determination [18]. Maxillary canine has shown significant results for sexual dimorphism [18], [19] .

A recent study evaluated the ability of standard mandibular canine index (MCI) for gender determination for forensic investigations. It has estimated it to be 80% in female subjects, while 73.33% for male individuals [20]. A small jaw size among North-East Indians may be responsible for the variation in mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions among North Indians and North–East Indians.[21].

Further studies need to be carried out with larger samples to validate the results of this study.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Measurements were done with the digital vernier calliper.

Click text to open image
Table 1: Mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of maxillary permanent teeth for North Indian males

Click text to open image
Table 2: Mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of maxillary permanent teeth for North-East Indian females


Click text to open image
Table 3: Mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of maxillary permanent teethfor North-East Indian males


Click text to open image
Table 4: Mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of maxillary permanent teeth for North Indian females


Click text to open image
Table 5: Probable values of mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions for North Indian and North-East Indian males


Click text to open image
Table 6: Probable values of mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of maxillary permanent teeth for North Indian and North-East Indian females



CONCLUSION

The size of teeth is of great importance in establishing sexual dimorphism. The shape and dimensions of teeth does not change. Thus, they can be seen as a determining factor in providing racial dimorphism in skeletal remains,which is required for forensic identification purposes. The variety of teeth, number and morphology in each individual and belonging to a particular ethnic origin is a fact, which increases its importance as an identifying element. This difference in size and shape of teeth with the information obtained from a clinical registration document can help to distinguish the sex, age, relative size and ethnicity of the individual, resulting in a more accurate way of identifying the person sought.


REFERENCES
  1. Vodanovic M, Demo Z, Njemirovskij V, Keros J, Brkic H. Odontometrics: A useful method for sex determination in an archaeological skeletal population? Journal of Archaeological Science 2007;34(6):905–13.   [CrossRef]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Dempsey PJ, Townsend GC. Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in human tooth size. Heredity (Edinb) 2001 Jun;86(Pt 6):685–93.   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Astete JC, San Pedro JV, Iván Suazo GI. Sexual dimorphism in the tooth dimensions of Spanish and Chilean Peoples. Int J Odontostomat 2009;3(1);47–50.    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Kaushal S, Patnaik VVG, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canines in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2003;52(2):119–24.    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Black GV. Descriptive Anatomy of Human Teeth. 4ed. Philadelphia: The S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Company; 1902.    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Stewart TD. Identification by the skeletal structures. In: Camps FE, editor. Gradwohl’s Legal Medicine. 3ed. Bristol: John Wright and Sons; 1976. p. 110.    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Ebeling CF, Ingervall B, Hedegård B, Lewin T. Secular changes in tooth size in Swedish men. Acta Odontol Scand 1973;31(3):141–7.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Yuen KK, So LL, Tang EL. Mesiodistal crown diameters of the primary and permanent teeth in southern Chinese: A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 1997 Dec;19(6):721–31.   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Rao NG, Rao NN, Pai ML, Kotian MS. Mandibular canine-index—a clue for establishing sex identity. Forensic Sci Int 1989 Aug;42(3):249–54.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Kondo S, Townsend GC, Yamada H. Sexual dimorphism of cusp dimensions in human maxillary molars. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005 Dec;128(4):870–7.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 10
  11. Acharya AB, Mainali S. Univariate sex dimorphism in the Nepalese dentition and the use of discriminant functions in gender assessment. Forensic Sci Int 2007 Nov 15;173(1):47–56.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 11
  12. Suazo GI, Mario Cantín LM, López FB, et al. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal and bucolingual tooth dimensions in Chilean People. Int J Morphol 2008;26(3):609–14.    Back to citation no. 12
  13. Iscan MY, Kedici PS. Sexual variation in bucco-lingual dimensions in Turkish dentition. Forensic Sci Int 2003 Nov 26;137(2-3):160–4.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 13
  14. Doris JM, Bernard BW, Kuftinec MM, Stom D. A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding. Am J Orthod 1981 Mar;79(3):326–36.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 14
  15. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. J Dent Res 1967 Sep–Oct;46(5):963–72.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 15
  16. Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. Am J Orthod 1975 Aug;68(2):157–64.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 16
  17. Narang RS, Manchanda AS, Malhotra R, Bhatia HS. Sex determination by mandibular canine index and molar odontometrics: A comparative study. Indian J Oral Sci 2014;5:16–20.    Back to citation no. 17
  18. Metgud R, Surbhi, Naik S, Patel S. Odontometrics: A useful method for gender determination in Udaipur population. J Forensic Investigation 2015;3(2):5.   [CrossRef]    Back to citation no. 18
  19. Khangura RK, Sircar K, Singh S, Rastogi V. Sex determination using mesiodistal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011 Jul;3(2):81–5.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 19
  20. Gandhi N, Jain S, Kahlon H, Singh A, Gambhir RS, Gaur A. Significance of mandibular canine index in sexual dimorphism and aid in personal identification in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017 May–Aug;9(2):56–60.   [CrossRef]   [PubMed]    Back to citation no. 20
  21. Rajendran A, Sivapathasundharam B. Shafer's Textbook of Oral Pathology. 7ed. India: Elesvier; 2012.    Back to citation no. 21

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Harjeet Kaur Sekhon – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Priyanka Sharma – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Jyoti Sharma – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Harmanpreet Singh – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Simranjit Singh – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of Submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of Support
None
Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this study.
Conflict of Interest
Author declares no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2018 Harjeet Kaur Sekhon et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.